CPA Practice Advisor

OCT 2014

Today's Technology for Tomorrow's Firm.

Issue link: https://cpapracticeadvisor.epubxp.com/i/399112

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 23 of 35

24 October 2014 • www.CPAPracticeAdvisor.com A YEAR IN THE LIFE: SALT ACCOUNTANT Sales ta x, the "pay me now" ta x, is pa id to the reta i ler at the time of p u r c h a s e . G e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , traditional brick and mortar stores a re requ i red to col lec t state a nd local sales ta x on retail sales. Many online retailers are not required to collect sales ta xes on sales shipped to a not her st ate si mply bec au se they do not have a ta xable presence t h e r e (t y p i c a l l y , p r o p e r t y o r employees). Use ta x, the "pay me later" ta x, is r e q u i r e d t o b e r e m i t t e d b y t he purchaser/consumer/end-user for t a x a ble t r a n s a c t io n s w he r e t he seller/retailer did not charge sales t a x (i . e . , i n t e r n e t s a l e s). M a n y pu rchasers a re eit her u nawa re of t h i s r e q u i r e m e n t o r c h o o s e t o ignore it. Some states prov ide clear guidance and a convenient method for remiting the ta x (e.g., line item on the state sales ta x or income ta x return ), while other states prov ide litle to no guidance coupled w ith conf using remitance methods. To summarize, if the transaction is ta xable, and not ta xed at the time of sale, the corresponding use ta x is likely due from the purchaser. For e x a m ple , w he n a M i n ne - apolis restaurant owner purchases new dishes at a Minnesota restau- ra nt supply compa ny (deemed a ta xable sale), M innesota sales ta x w o u l d b e d u e . H o w e v e r, i f t h e d i she s were pu rc h a se d over t he internet from a Wyoming retailer; and the retailer was not required to col lec t M i n nesot a sa les t a x , t he rest au ra nt wou ld be requ i red to self-assess and remit the applicable use ta x to Minnesota. A s you might surmise from the above example, states have str ug- gled w ith use ta x collection and are look ing to t he Ma rket place Fa i r- ness Act as a mechanism to increase sales/use ta x compliance. Last year, the Senate passed the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), wh ich wou ld a l low state gover n- ments to require retailers w ithout a physical presence in the state of t he pu rc h a ser (Wyom i ng ba se d r e s t a u r a n t s u p p l y f r o m o u r example) to collect that state's sales ta x. Te bill has been referred to a Hou s e of R e pre sent at i ve s c om- mitee for rev iew. If the bill passes t h e H o u s e , t h e n i t w i l l l i k e l y become law as the W hite House has already expressed its support. Proponents of the bill claim that it w i l l help level t he play ing feld bet ween online retailers and brick and mortar retailers, and w ill also help struggling states increase their revenue. Opponents arg ue that it w ill hurt online businesses not only w ith price increases associated w ith collecting sales ta x, but also from the potential cost to integrate a new accounting system to fle and remit mu lt iple sa les t a x ret u r n s . I n a n efort to ease this burden, the MFA prov ides for a "small-seller excep- tion" which is applicable to sellers w ith annual gross receipts in total U.S. remote sales not exceeding $1 million. A s it c u r rent ly sta nds, t he bi l l would only allow states that meet cer t a i n m i n i mu m sa les t a x l aw/ procedure simpli fcation require- ments to participate. Te allure of increased sales ta x revenue v ia the remote seller rule may persuade the non- compl ia nt st ates to rev a mp their sa les ta x reg imes to comply w ith the minimum requirements of the bill. W hether you are a proponent or o p p o n e n t o f t h e M a r k e t p l a c e Fa i r n e s s A c t , i t 's i m p o r t a n t t o understand that a use ta x responsi- bilit y has always ex isted on ta xable transactions, where sa les ta x was not col lec ted . T he M a rket pl ace Fa ir ness Act is merely one of the l a t e s t a t t e m p t s b y C o n g r e s s t o a d d r e s s a m a j o r c o m p l i a n c e problem. How Does the Marketplace Fairness Act Affect Use Taxes? By Judy Vorndran, CPA, JD W hile almost ever yone has heard of sales tax, many business owners are unaware that most states have a "use tax." State laws treat sales and use tax as two sepa- rate taxes, but in reality they act in concert to complement each other. Tink of them as a "pay me now or pay me later" tax. Judy Vorndran, CPA , JD, is a Partner, and Alex Korzhen, JD, MBA , is a Manager with Eide Bailly, a top 25 CPA frm with 24 ofces in 11 states. Eide Bailly's National Tax Ofce serves as a resource for clients to help analyze complex tax issues related to business decisions.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of CPA Practice Advisor - OCT 2014